Over the past week or so we
have been hearing about the Charlie Hebdo cartoon incident where a
satirical magazine illustrated the prophet Muhammad, which in Muslim religion
it is strictly against their faith to depict their prophet. This resulted in
attacks on the creators of Charlie Hebdo ending in many deaths and injuries.
This news brings up one concept that is of interest to me, and that is moral
reasoning. When do we think something is right or wrong, and how do we learn
that? For the controversy mentioned above there is no correct answer at this
moment over freedom of speech and what lines should be drawn and when. Why did
Charlie Hebdo think it was okay for them to disrespect a religion practiced
among thousands of people. Or why did some people think that killing the
creators was acceptable? Kohlberg’s theory of moral development suggest that
there are 3 stages of moral development: pre-conventional, conventional, and
post-conventional. In the pre-conventional stage (suggested to be those of 9
years or younger) will obey rules to avoid punishment or receive rewards. In
the conventional stage (suggested to be most adolescents and adults) will obey
rules to avoid disapproval and maintain social order. In the post-conventional
stage (suggested to be those of minority) will follow laws for the welfare of
the larger community, or believe in and follow self-chosen universal ethical
principles. Although there were some limitations to Kohlberg’s theory because
it was based on western cultures it can somewhat depict the moral reasoning in
the Charlie Hebdo controversy. Those of Islamic culture may feel threatened
when Charlie Hebdo disrespected their faith thus leading them to feel in the
minority. Perhaps, in order to protect their faith of their larger community,
the Muslim faith, they felt as though it was necessary for the French to serve
justice. To them maybe death was the ultimate justice they thought was
needed. Note the emphasis on 'thought'. The
answer may lie in psychological processing. Different cultures offer different
experiences which ultimately shape the way each person thinks and views the
world. This creates the differences we see among people on whether they view a
situation as right or wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment